Posts Tagged ‘arts journalism’

The Human Need to Know and To Tell

Thursday, January 31st, 2013

January 31, 2013

by Victoria Hutter 

Eric Newton of the Knight Foundation

Eric Newton. Photo courtesy of the Knight Foundation.

On April 12, 2012, Eric Newton, senior adviser to the president of the Knight Foundation, posted an article on the Knight Foundation website titled, “Why we need new models for arts journalism.” The article coincided with the launch of the Knight/NEA Community Arts Journalism Challenge that we’ve written about recently on this blog. In his post, Eric asked three questions: Is arts journalism in trouble? Does it matter? Can anything be done to help?

We thought it would be interesting to touch base with Eric almost one year and one major arts journalism initiative later to see what he’s been thinking lately about the state of arts journalism.

NEA: The first question you posed in your article was, “Is arts journalism in trouble?” How would you respond to that question today?

ERIC NEWTON: Local arts journalism is still in trouble.

We’ve seen both small changes and larger trends and either could have an impact on the future of local arts journalism. People are trying things here and there but the problem is so large. There are news deserts all across the country and you can’t just turn a desert into an oasis over night. It took a long time for the current model to take shape. So, we have to think in terms of larger time frames. But arts journalism will come back simply because of the human need to know and the human need to tell and those needs don’t lessen over time.

We are in what I call a Clay Shirky moment. He’s the one who said, “Nothing will work but everything might.” There isn’t any one thing that has surfaced as the answer but we’re still in the position that everything might.

NEA: How does arts journalism fit into the metamorphosis of journalism in general?

NEWTON: One thing you need to keep in mind, of course, is that the information revolution is speeding up not slowing down. I’m reminded of a speech that Richard Gringas, head of news products at Google, gave at the last Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication conference. He noted that technology has not moved from a steady state of non-digital (one-way, mass media) to digital. We are experiencing a shift from a relatively steady state of non-digital to a constantly changing digital age.

That’s frightening in some ways but it also provides opportunities again and again and again. For example, look at some countries in the Third World that were never properly wired with landline telephones. Now they can just forget about that and go straight to wireless.

The mobile and social world is just exploding. I can pull out my phone, use my Siri app (defined on Wikipedia as an “intelligent personal assistant and knowledge navigator”) and find the closest art museum to my location and then what Yelp has to say about it. With these new tools, it’s easier and easier to lower the barriers of entry until finally somebody comes up with a new approach that works.

NEA: What do you think new payment methods might be and how are businesses going to finance and make money with future journalism models?

NEWTON: I believe there is a misperception some content people have that no one will pay for content. People will pay for anything that they want that is not available elsewhere for free. Having free e-books online actually has increased the sale of printed books. You can’t get the printed one for free. If you want it, you have to buy it.

If you tracked paid content and free content you’d find that paid content exploded right along with the free content. But what kind of paid content? For example, ringtones. Standard ring tones are free, but give people other options and they will choose and pay for what they want to have.

We’ve seen this in traditional news organizations with the creation of digital subscriptions systems that make some things free and some things not. Or take digital games. It’s free but you have to contend with ads. If you don’t want the ads, not a problem, but you have to pay for that ad-free game. It’s actually quite sophisticated.

NEA: What other developments have you found interesting or exciting?

NEWTON: I’ve been surprised about the success of crowd-sourced financing. You look at Kickstarter and there’s a lot of money given to a lot of people to do a lot of creative things. Extend that to individuals and the power of small donations made many times over.

For example, rather than give $100 to one local organization, I might use products like Kachingle, a micropayment platform, and my computer would tell me what I’ve been paying attention to and suggest that I donate to those interests. So I’ll press a button and my $100 gets split up between the blogger I’ve been following and the theater company news I have been consuming.

Partnerships with educational institutions are also promising with students gaining real world experience by having their stories appear in the local newspaper. Among other things, it’s a good way to learn community engagement, by dealing with both positive comments and negative comments, and in reaching out for ideas and reporting information. It’s pushing academic programs toward the teaching-hospital model.

I also see more possibilities with business professionals who, once they retire, are interested in contributing their expertise to organizations for free. They don’t need to write for a living. Now they can write for pleasure. We’ve got decades of well-educated boomer volunteer power on the horizon. We read about the strain those retirees will put on the retirement and medical systems, but there’s an opportunity for significant giveback as well.

NEA: Where do you think the next arts journalism model will come from?

NEWTON: Every generation in American history has grown up with a new form of media. All we can say for sure is that things explode upwards on a regular basis and if we can’t get it right this time, there will be even more technology to help get it right the next time.

Also, something that you’re seeing is younger journalists developing the ability to work in open, collaborative groups that might include a technical person, a designer, programmer, business person, an entrepreneur, etc. Those enterprises that have fairly equal proportions of content, technology, and business are more likely to do well.

NEA: Any final thoughts?

NEWTON: One, I think keeping our footing during this period of transition is just as important as anything else. Second, go back to what I said earlier: this is all driven by the human desire to know and to tell which increases with each generation.

Finally, five or six years ago there was a sense of crisis and being on a straight downhill trajectory but now there’s hope that we will continue to make progress. And the fact that the NEA has decided that arts journalism is a meaningful component of their grantmaking is very important.

Drexel U + Philadelphia Daily News = Art Attack

Friday, January 25th, 2013

January 25, 2013

by Victoria Hutter

Logos of Philadelphia Daily News and two Drexel University arts websites

Image courtesy of Pixeltown

In part two of our series catching up with the finalists of the Knight/NEA Community Arts Journalism Challenge, we’re heading to the City of Brotherly Love where Art Attack is mentoring the next generation of arts journalists while broadening the scope of the city’s arts reporting. Under the Art Attack umbrella, a partnership between Drexel University’s Center for Cultural Outreach in the Pennoni Honors College and the Philadelphia Daily News, reviews and features produced by students and journalists affiliated with the university appear each Friday in the features section of the Daily News.

Drexel already publishes high-quality reports through two websites: Cultural Passport and The Smart Set. But the goal of Art Attack is to generate not only reviews and features but also more critical writing and “think pieces,” providing newspaper readers with a richer context from which to understand and experience the arts in the city.

Jason Wilson, project director of Art Attack and director of the Center for Cultural Outreach, acknowledged that placing more substantive art pieces can be challenging. “Arts coverage is impacted not only by budget constraints, but also by editorial vision for what arts coverage can be.”

Wilson remembered listening to NEA acting chairman Joan Shigekawa at the Knight/NEA Community Arts Journalism Challenge press conference in October 2011 when five semi-finalists were announced. At that event, Shigekawa delineated four different types of coverage, noting that critical analysis and in-depth profiles were the two types she felt were missing the most from arts coverage.

“I really took that to heart,” said Wilson. “That’s what we’re pushing for with this project.” He added, “There is a cultural shift within city newspapers that we’re interested in furthering. Our job then becomes finding the writers that best match that editorial vision.”

Wilson has been impressed with the ability of the Drexel students to do professional grade work. “It takes a while sometimes but we do find young writers who really deliver. We have plenty of students contributing 500-800 word pieces, profiles, features.”

Beginning mid-February Art Attack will have its own web page at Philly.com. A very pleased Wilson is looking forward to being able to include in-depth pieces about the arts in Philadelphia on the website. “We’re going to try this and I’m confident it will be successful.”

Want to know more about NEA support for arts journalism projects? Join us for an Art Works guidelines webinar with Local Arts Agencies Director Michael Killoren on Tuesday, January 29 at 4:00 pm ET. Can’t make the webinar? Not to worry, we’ll post an archived version soon after the event!

 

CriticCar and the Art of Detroit

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2013

January 22, 2013

by Victoria Hutter

“You can’t separate the city from the arts, it’s all part of the same passion.” — Jennifer Conlin, CriticCar

On April 19 of last year, the NEA and the Knight Foundation announced the three finalists of the Knight/NEA Community Arts Journalism Challenge. Each of the finalists offered a new model to strengthen local arts coverage.

Among those finalists is Jennifer Conlin, a long-time, contributing writer for The New York Times. Along with Deb Polich, executive director of Artrain, Jennifer is leading CriticCar, a mobile recording project that crisscrosses the city, offering event-goers the opportunity to record mini video reviews as they exit performances and exhibitions. Those interviews, posted on a dedicated YouTube channel, are intended not only to create buzz about cultural events, but to demonstrate the diversity and excitement of Detroit’s cultural life.

Jennifer came by the NEA offices recently to chat about what’s happening with CriticCar.

NEA: You’ve been at this for several months now, tell me how CriticCar is doing.

JENNIFER CONLIN: In the fall of 2012, I and my team decided to attend several big festivals. One was the Detroit Design Festival (a community-curated festival that highlights the work of Detroit’s creative community) in September and the other was DLECTRICITY (an exhibition of light both on and inside buildings) in downtown Detroit in November. Both were interesting and diverse events that lasted two to three days. We tried to hit as many different venues within each festival as we could. DELECTRICITY was amazing as it lit up the outsides of all these incredible buildings in Detroit, working with the architecture in unusual ways. And there were light shows inside as well. For example, there was a shadow puppet show in the Detroit Institute of Arts.

So, we went around and tested the theory of CriticCar, which is to give people 30 seconds to share something specific about an exhibition or performance that they enjoyed. I’ve had very few people turn down an opportunity to give their voice to this. We get the audience reactions on our YouTube channel and, starting this week, now hope to get them up either later that day or the next morning. Then, people interested in checking out the festival can see those mini-reviews to figure out what they would like to see. Also, when the festival is held again next year, we can post the interviews in advance to encourage people to go to the festival and experience it.

NEA: I understand that your camera is an iPad. Why did you choose that device?

CONLIN: We want the project to be casual and feel young. If you have a large, expensive video camera or even one of the smaller handheld ones, there’s still a sense of formality between the interviewer and the interviewee. We thought the iPad would be fun and we liked the rough look that emerged that in a way matched the edginess of Detroit. The other thing with the iPad is that people who are watching us film can watch it on the iPad too. It allows for another form of involvement in the project.

NEA: What’s next for the project?

CONLIN: What we are doing now is getting ready for the Detroit Auto Show which opens to the public on January 19th. The big thing about the show is the design of the cars. Because this is Detroit, obviously, automotive design is part of the culture. The College of Creative Design Studies here is one of the few top automotive design departments. So we are going to ask people what they think of the designs. Plus within the show there will be other cultural events to attend. We are considering this as our big launch and after that we will begin to cover things more regularly.

NEA: Speaking of regular coverage, how do you choose which events to attend?

CONLIN: For me, it’s about the diversity of places and different types of performances. We’re interested in covering Wayne State University, which has a wonderful theater program so we’ll go to a performance there, or the Detroit Symphony Orchestra, or a church where there’s a wonderful choral group. I’m looking to give voice to what people are seeing [so they can] tell us what they like and don’t like as “citizen journalists.” (more…)

Why We Still Need Professional Art Critics

Monday, August 15th, 2011

August 15, 2011

By John Ephland

John Ephland. Photo by Kristin Putney

When approached by the NEA to respond to the conversation between NEA Senior Deputy Chairman Joan Shigekawa and the Knight Foundation’s Vice President for Arts Dennis Scholl about the Knight/NEA Community Arts Journalism Challenge, my first thoughts were about the subject itself: art criticism. What it is, what is it not, and what’s it to ya?

Like most people who write about art, I love the subject matter I write about most: music. As a music writer and critic for over 25 years now, my “scene” has tended to go beyond the so-called community to include the wider “Community,” where geography matters less than the subject being written about. I understand that, yes, everyone to varying degrees has their own opinions on, say, whether Herbie Hancock is really a jazz musician or something else. But without the learned scribe who has made certain choices in his or her life to stay with Hancock’s music and life, and hopefully been changed by it, we are a poorer society. The music community is supported by the communities at large that love music. The connective, literary tissue is, in this case, most often the music writer. And many times, that community becomes something that transcends a particular locale.

(more…)

A New Golden Age?

Wednesday, August 10th, 2011

August 10, 2011

By Abraham Ritchie

Abraham Ritchie
Abraham Ritchie. Photo by Anna Wolak

Like a ship heading towards open ocean, progressive art is constantly moving away from us. Culture does not slow down or stop when visual art is cut from school curricula or when art critics are fired from major newspapers. Rather it is the community that suffers, as the public becomes distanced from its own culture. Unaware of the innovations that are going on and why, the community can become alienated from art. The artists can also suffer, though they are still fundamentally connected to culture in ways that the public is not. Without critics, artists can pursue unproductive or backwards paths.

The art critic is crucial to both the public and to artists. The art critic must connect new art to the public, providing a platform for understanding and appreciation. Logically, the critic must also give critical feedback to the artists who are focused on innovation in their work. This allows the artist to improve their practice or reject the critic’s assessment. Rather than invalidating the critic’s point, this will build complexity into the conception of an artwork. After all, once a point has been made it cannot be forgotten, though it can be ignored.

Increasingly, however, mainstream art criticism is merely being used as a public relations outlet for the arts industry. This is the real danger to art and to culture; that it is used as a tourist attraction rather than understood as meaningful culture. This is damaging to artists and the public alike as both are given a superficial understanding of culture. Artists are not given real input about their work, which can allow them to become complacent, and their work to become irrelevant or pandering. The public is merely told the “where” and “when” of art, but not the “why.”

(more…)

The Effects of Social Media on Traditional Journalism

Friday, August 5th, 2011

August 5, 2011

by Chad Bauman, Director of Communications, Arena Stage

Chad Bauman. Photo courtesy of Mr. Bauman

In my role as director of communications at Arena Stage, I supervise media relations in addition to marketing and a few other areas. As originally intended, this blog was developed to discuss arts marketing, however from time to time, I stray a little and write about topics that affect media relations, as will be the case today.

A couple of weeks ago, I found myself participating in a very interesting discussion via Twitter with Howard Sherman, Peter Marks, Trey Graham, Nella Vera, David Loehr, and Kris Vire. This impromptu panel discussion was centered around the effects of social media on traditional practices in arts journalism. With both publicists and journalists recognizing that the traditional media landscape is changing, it made me think about what’s next. Below are my thoughts that formed in the weeks since.

For a primer on the subject, may I suggest the following articles:
Should Theater Critics be Allowed to Tweet an Opinion Before Writing a Review?” Washington City Paper, 10/20/2010
Hey, Broadway-Based Spiderman Boosters: Twitter’s Not a Supervillain” NPR, 12/1/10
Will the Embargo Hold?” 2amt, 7/12/11
Stop Telling Me What to Think About Your ShowThe Craptacular, 7/12/11

From my point of view, the effects of social media on…

New Play Development
The days of developing new work under the watchful eyes of millions of New Yorkers may be over. And the Broadway tryout in major metropolitan areas could be as well. Why anyone would make the choice to develop new work directly on Broadway itself baffles me, as there is no room for error. I couldn’t imagine a worse place to develop work. To be extraordinary, one must be able to take risks. With the rise of social media, every risk taken (and failure made) is a potential headline in the now influential blogosphere. In the past, producers and publicists had to concern themselves with crafting stories for professional journalists and preparing for traditional reviews, but in today’s world, before the first review hits, public opinion can be persuaded by millions of tweets, Facebook posts, and blogs. In some cases, by the time the impartial and professional critic walks through the doors of a theater, the verdict in the court of public opinion has already been rendered. As information travels at the speed of light to every corner of the world these days, it would not surprise me if the major development work for high profile, Broadway-bound productions starts to occur at smaller and smaller venues in more remote areas of the country. Even major regional theaters in large metropolitan areas may become too “exposed” to be able to shelter the development process of new work. My prediction: Places like Virginia Stage Company, a LORT D theater in Norfolk, Virginia, which just recently produced a highly acclaimed pre-Broadway run of Bruce Hornsby’s SCKBSTD, will become the new go-to places for development of high profile projects.

(more…)

Arts Criticism for the Millennials

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011

August 3, 2011

by Maura Judkis, Producer, Style, Washington Post

Head shot of Washington Post arts writer Maura Judkis

Maura Judkis. Photo by Jay Westcott, Politico

In the last hour on Twitter, I’ve read that artist William Powhida’s New York show is a dud, and that Hugo Weaving’s performance as the Red Skull is a high point in Captain America. These weren’t opinions from published critics; rather, they were from regular Twitter users with an enthusiasm for art and pop culture. Readers of my generation, the Millennials, are more likely to want to see a movie or play because their friends like it than because a critic does. We’re more likely to discover art through our Facebook and Twitter feeds, and to take the suggestions of Netflix and Pandora than to discover new things on our own.

It might seem, then, that Millennials have no appetite for arts journalism, but that’s not the case: Younger readers want to read and share stories more than ever. They just want to have a say in what’s being read and shared. They want to be the critics. So where do arts journalists fit in?

There is an abundance of opinion on the Internet, but bringing reporting into criticism is what will set the professional arts journalists apart from the amateur. Reporting on process—the behind-the-scenes stories that enable readers to identify with artists—will attract audiences who might otherwise overlook an arts journalist in favor of their best friend’s Tumblr. It’s something I learned firsthand, both at TBD.com, Washington’s newest online news organization, and a 10-day stint at the pop-up newsroom of Engine 28 for the NEA Arts Journalism Institute in Theater and Musical Theater.

TBD.com hired me to write about theater and art, not to be a critic. Between legacy media, blogs, and random Twitter followers longing to share their opinions, we decided that Washington’s flourishing arts scene had enough critical voices in the mix. Starting a new site with a new critic would have been shouting into a crowded room. So we eschewed criticism, almost entirely, in favor of film, theater, and music coverage that was reported often with a critical voice. (more…)

Arts Journalism and the Community

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

July 27, 2011

by Juan Devis, Director of Production and Program Development, KCET

KCET reporter Juan Devis standing in a river bed interviewing urban planner john Arroyo
Juan Devis (right) interviews urban planner John Arroyo at the confluence of the Los Angeles River and the Arroyo Seco. Photo courtesy of KCET

Good criticism reveals layers of hidden meaning, allowing audiences to uncover the relationship a particular work of art has to place and community. A critic who doesn’t understand local connections, or can’t translate them legibly for their audience, is unable to explain how culture and the production of art is embedded in daily life.

For example, the way that local geography, economics, and the law structures that staple of Los Angeles life—the backyard party—is fundamental to understanding the growth of DJ culture in Southern California. Similarly, the aerospace industry played a fundamental—but often unsung—role in the development of the art scene in Venice in the 1970s. Variables such as the economy, access, transportation, and landscape—to name a few—have had an enormous impact on the development of these artistic expressions.

The critic then needs to step away from the laptop and into the streets to see how art is produced and consumed by the citizenry in order to understand the cultural world that extends beyond museum walls and performance halls.

The work that we have been doing in Los Angeles through KCET’s Departures is such an attempt to reconcile the relationship that art has to place and community, and to the development of the city’s cultural identity as a whole.

We live in a networked, participatory culture where the consumption of art is not only multi-linear—see it, record it, social media it—but where the recommendation of a peer often carries more weight than the word of the critic.

This is forcing many of us to expand not just the ways in which we think and write about culture, but the traditional vehicles we use to communicate them.

Beyond writing a review and sharing an informed opinion, the art critic must become a context provider who creates stories that are not an end to themselves, but instead act as the seeds for engagement.

This expansion of the critic’s role brings with it challenges, first and foremost around the critic’s idealized historic role as impartial observer, since becoming a context provider forces the critic to engage with the artistic subject matter in unanticipated and perhaps unorthodox ways.

Similarly, the art critic should engage with the idea of access as central to his or her role as a public intellectual. In a new media environment, the critical problem becomes not just one of analysis but also  distribution, forcing the critic to create contextual spaces—platforms—where community members can become participants in the re-telling or creation of a story.

The production of culture now involves a web of interconnected variables that come together to articulate a story. We use social spaces to post, share and comment on photos, clips, songs, location-based check-ins and videos, all of which come together to create a multi-linear narrative of who we are as people, a groups and a society.

As mentioned earlier, this open story and narrative modality allows a critic to reveal new layers of meaning that can create a platform for audience participation and engagement.

A case study of how art criticism can function as engagement and participation platform can be found in a recent project we embarked on in the neighborhood of Highland Park—The Full Dollar Project—a partnership between KCET’s Departures, Occidental College, and Outpost for Contemporary Art.

More than any other neighborhood in Los Angeles, Highland Park’s cyclical history can be seen as a microcosm of the evolution of the city as a whole, each era creating the context from the next generation to emerge.

Beginning with the land boom of the 1880s, new arrivals to Highland Park turned the riverbanks and hills of the Arroyo Seco into a natural retreat from the bustling, industrial downtown of Los Angeles. In the process they created the city’s first art colony, which in turn gave birth to the Arts and Crafts Movement.

During the 1950s, Mexican immigrants and their descendants moved into Highland Park, generally claiming the area as their own. These new arrivals began changing the face of Highland Park at the same moment that the Civil Rights era dawned. New community organizations took root on the East Side, articulating a vocabulary of resistance and pride within the Latino and Mexican communities of Los Angeles.

It’s no surprise then, that in the 1970s Highland Park became home to the influential Chicana/o artist’s collectives Mechicano and Concilio de Arte Popular, which included among their members some of the most important Chicana/o artists of their time. In marked contrast to the upscale gallery scene of West Los Angeles or the concerns of Westside artists in Venice, Highland Park was birthing art that emphasized the themes of community, cultural pride, and economic struggle. The work of these collectives on the eastside housing projects of Ramona Gardens and Estrada Courts and in numerous public spaces and institutions across the city,ignited an explosion of Chicana/o muralism in the 1970s, turning L.A. into the mural capital of the country.

As a way of celebrating and reconsidering Highland Park’s vast and critically important artistic heritage in Los Angeles—from the Arts and Crafts movement to Chicano Muralism—Departures is working to understand and record the new cultural cycle that the neighborhood is currently experiencing. With that in mind, we’ve partnered with Outpost for Contemporary Art, artist-in-residence X. Andrade, and a team of Occidental College media art students to examine, re-interpret and reconsider the tradition of public art in Highland Park.

This project underscores the underlying paradigms, ideas, and directions discussed early in these answers. New public art projects and storefronts will be created in the area in collaboration with local artists, sign painters, and business owners; the process of production, the negotiation between parties, the exchange of ideas and the translation of cultural concepts, will be documented on the Departures website via video interviews, texts, essays and commentaries, maps, and QR codes as well as user and audience participation. Acting as meta-critic, the role of this project is not just to record, report and broadcast the cultural stories of out time; our aim is to create mechanisms—be it partnerships or online tools—through which audiences can take direct action in the creation of a more livable community.

Juan Devis is a Public Media artist and producer whose work crosses across platforms—video, film, interactive media, and gaming. His work, regardless of the medium is often produced collaboratively allowing for a greater exchange of ideas in the production of media and art. Devis is currently in director of program development and production for KCET, the largest independent television station in the United States.

Why Arts Journalism Matters

Friday, July 22nd, 2011

July 22, 2011

by Rainey Knudson, Founder/Director, Glasstire

Head shot of Glasstire founder Rainey Knudson
Rainey Knudson is the founder and director of Glasstire, a website about visual art in Texas now celebrating its 10th anniversary. Photo by Everett Taasevigen.

Why does art criticism matter?

Art criticism matters because art matters. [If you’re not sure or can’t remember why art matters, I recommend this wonderful interview with Milton Glaser on the website BigThink. He articulates why art matters as elegantly and charmingly as you could ever want.]

We need good art journalism because the basic way we engage with ideas and philosophies (e.g., art) is through talking about those ideas (e.g., writing). We also need art journalism because we like to know what’s going on in our cities. We like to know where the good stuff is.

In recent years, there’s been a groundswell of recognition about the alarming state of arts journalism. Witness the current collaboration between the Knight Foundation and the NEA; or the USC Annenberg/Getty Arts Journalism Program; or the Warhol Foundation’s Arts Writing Initiative. The sense of urgency has resulted in a bit more funding for some writers, which is a good start.

The truth is, if we can just crack the nut of paying great art critics a living wage, then the arts journalism of the near future has the potential to be radically more effective, with far greater reach, than the old print model that has crumbled around us.

In their conversation on this blog, the NEA’s Joan Shigekawa and the Knight Foundation’s Dennis Scholl cite a study that found that 50 percent of local arts journalism jobs have been lost in the past five to eight years.

It’s a shocking number, but in addition to spurring us all to action, it should also politely beg the question of how vital those critics were if their jobs (and their papers) wilted so suddenly. There’s probably a reason that that brand of arts journalism is dying, and it’s not solely that advertising dollars are migrating away from print. Arts journalism in the heyday of the daily newspaper got concentrated in the hands of too few people. For some of them, the easiest route was to applaud every show they wrote about, or to only cover their small coterie of friends.

Bloggers and web startups said, “We can make this more fun, more entertaining, more vital, for way less money.” Now those bloggers and websites are playing an ever-more critical role in arts journalism, and they themselves have to figure out how to pay their writers.

The nut’s going to get cracked; we’re all just figuring out exactly how. (more…)

Experiments in Online Arts Journalism

Thursday, July 14th, 2011

July 14, 2011

by Kerry Lengel

photo of arizona theater reporter Kerry Lengel

Kerry Lengel. Photo by Michael McNamara

Ten days in Los Angeles to see cutting-edge theater, rub intellectual elbows with critics from around the country and launch a ?pop-up newsroom? as a no-rules experiment in online arts journalism: Last month?s NEA fellowship program for theater writers was a ?dream? gig and a highlight of my career. But for me, the dream ended slightly ahead of schedule.

On day nine, my iPhone started buzzing with news and rumors about a nationwide wave of layoffs at Gannett Co. newspapers. While the other fellows were enjoying a celebratory dance lesson from choreographer Ryan Heffington (of RuPaul?s Drag Race fame), I was frantically texting to find out if any of my colleagues back at The Arizona Republic would be affected. (Some of them were.)

It was a rude awakening, but it was also a reminder of why we were there in the first place. Online journalism is only a hot topic because print journalism is on the financial ropes. The digital revolution has changed the rules for reporters and critics—just as it has, and will continue to do, for artists and performers as well.

The 2011 fellowship—formally, the NEA Arts Journalism Institute in Theater and Musical Theater—was a radical departure from previous programs. In past years, the writers traveled together to performances and lectures and enjoyed lengthy discussions on the nuances of criticism. They wrote reviews of the shows, but only for an audience consisting of each other, as well as the top national critics on hand to serve as mentors.

This year, it was more of a working vacation. The 21 fellows, with help from a similar number of professional editors and support staff, launched a website, Engine28.com, to cover two major theater festivals (RADAR L.A. and the Hollywood Fringe) and the Theater Communication Group?s (TCG) national conference.

The site was live, but the emphasis was on process, not product. The fellows—journalists from daily newspapers, alternative weeklies, radio stations, and online-only publications—were encouraged to step out of their comfort zones. So in addition to writing traditional reviews, I also shot video, talked on camera (gasp!), and produced a podcast review.

With 21 journalists working 15-hour days, Engine28 was chock-full of lively content, including some interesting experiments in non-traditional journalism ranging from a podcast debate about the characters in The Last Five Years to a blog post consisting entirely of text messages.

But, at least in my opinion, some of the best and most meaningful work looked suspiciously like old-school journalism, such as Willamette Week editor Ben Waterhouse?s article on the vexing art of supertitle translations and Salt Lake Tribune reporter Ben Fulton?s piece about cultivating the next generation of theatergoers.

Indeed, our postmortem discussions underlined the fact that the new ?Wild West? of online journalism is an exceedingly difficult landscape to navigate. We all know, for example, that video is huge on the Internet. But on Engine28, videos were among the least-viewed items. Apparently, just because millions of people watch and share clips of kittens on YouTube doesn?t mean visitors to a news site are enticed by video. The reason? You can?t skim it, or stop halfway through to click on a related link. To commit to a video, you have to give up your netizen?s autonomy, if only for 90 seconds. As Doug McLennan, Engine28?s online-journalism guru and editor of ArtsJournal, put it, ?There is a social cost to clicking.?

Journalism is a for-profit industry, but the challenges it is dealing with are remarkably similar to those facing the not-for-profit arts-and-culture sector. The Internet, especially the advent of social media, has toppled the old monopolies of cultural production and introduced new competition for those all-important eyeballs, or, in the performing arts, the proverbial ?butts in seats.? For both journalists and artists, the challenge of the 21st century is learning how to turn what used to be a one-way conversation into a true dialogue, to meet the audience on their own (virtual) turf in a relationship of equals. (This was the theme of McLennan?s keynote address at the TCG conference, which was streamed live online; you can watch it here.)

This is a hard reality for many journalists to face—and not just because of the natural human resistance to change. The new opportunities of the Internet age come with some serious downsides (Gene Weingarten?s recent rant about how ?branding? is ruining journalism made a big splash among my colleagues). But like it or not, the world has changed, and all of us—artists and arts journalists alike—have to change with it.

Kerry Lengel is the theater writer at The Arizona Republic. In his 16-year career with the newspaper, he has held a variety of positions, including arts and entertainment editor, and has moonlighted as pop-music critic, film critic, and beer critic. He is a graduate of the University of Arizona.

This blog post originally appeared on the Arizona Commission on the Arts website.